“Responsible wildlife photographers observe a strict code of ethics. The cardinal rule: if anything you do directly or indirectly endangers, restricts or harasses an animal, stop and leave the animal alone. The integrity of a wildlife photograph evaporates if the subject was not free to come and go, if it shows fear or anxiousness, if it has been provoked to attack or to defend itself.”
~ Robert Winkler, A Wildlife Photography Primer
I saw a clip recently on You Tube where the videographer approached a grebe resting on the beach. He kept moving in until the stressed animal lunged away from him toward the water. A diving bird like a grebe has a difficult time moving on land. Its back legs are set far back on its body for water propulsion, making mobility on land more awkward.
The grebe settled in farther down the shore, but the photographer kept following. Once again, the poor grebe raised itself and moved closer to the shoreline. This routine persisted with the videographer not recognizing how his actions were harassing a bird that could have been injured or ill, owing to its position on the beach. At the very least, it was resting and warming itself, and should have been left alone.
I’ve witnessed far too many scenarios where the person behind the lens did precisely what the videographer on the beach did: put the interest of a film or a photo above the obvious concerns for the animal’s well-being.
Giving Wild Animals Space
If you look up wildlife or nature photography ethics on the net, it’s easy to find general guidelines like these, from the North American Nature Photography Association: first and foremost, do not create additional stress for the wild animal. I come at my love for wildlife images from both a visual and visceral standpoint. Obviously, I’m thrilled if I get a beautiful shot. But I also volunteer with wild animals and am acutely aware — increasingly so as time goes on — of the many stressors which plague them. Chief among those stresses are actions perpetrated by humans, either deliberately or out of ignorance.
This photo was taken just two months before the Cosco Busan oil spill in November 2007 — when the Bay and its bird life seemed largely at peace and unharmed. This Brown Pelican meandered our way as we sat on a dock near Tiburon.
I feel it’s incumbent upon the person photographing the animal to understand the animal first — to know what its signs of distress might be, to observe a rational and comfortable distance, to use long lenses (and teleconverters) and put the animal’s welfare and its sense of security above any photograph.
When you consider that a mere walk on a trail is bound to rustle a bird from your path, it’s impossible to be in shared spaces without causing some changes along these lines. All of us leave a footprint and an impact of some kind. But the deliberate and elective pursuit of an animal for a photograph is an unnecessary source of stress. We should all at least strive for higher ground in this regard.
This Pine Siskin was perched near the visitor center at Best Friends Animal Sanctuary in Utah — where animals, both domestic and wild, couldn’t be treated with more respect.
The Image is the Emissary
Recently, while walking in the Palo Alto Baylands, it was impossible not to notice the fervor with which bird parents were protecting their young. I was able to grab some shots with a long lens, from a populated walking path, without disturbing the birds. But I wasn’t about to add to their stress by forcing parent and chick into a space that might then expose them to a predator or other danger. In A Wildlife Photography Primer Robert Winkler points out that even checking a nest in your garden can leave a scent trail, from the babies to a predator’s nose.
This was among several lucky captures, of American Avocets at Palo Alto Baylands, just as they exhibited their breeding plumage, but before nesting season.
It’s an extremely fine line because there is a point where the image becomes an emissary for the animals. Without the beautiful wildlife photographs we see, there’d be far less appreciation for the creatures with whom we coexist. But for me, there’s a balance that must be struck — between the desire of the photographer and the comfort and safety of the subject. You need to know how far you can go, what situation your equipment is suited for, and what the disposition and stress level of that particular animal might be. We are, to many wild animals, predators. Interaction with humans isn’t the cute-fuzzy endeavor it sometimes seems to us. Our presence often evokes a stress or flight response — how profound, depends upon the animal. It’s important to keep that in mind when moving in their space and circles.
Stalking Wildlife for the Photo Op
On Flickr, I recently came upon some wildlife shots where the photographer bragged about how he’d hidden behind shrubs, off trail in a refuge, then quickly leaped in front of the animal as it trundled by, using a flash and snapping the animal in its moment of terror before it ran off. This particular photographer’s pages were littered with positive commentary for the “amazing” shots he was getting.
In some photos, based on the animal’s visible position or behavior, it seems the photographer might have baited or lured or otherwise brought the animal into frame by dubious means, even though baiting for a shot is a controversial topic.
Time, Patience, Distance
My rule of thumb, and the one by which I abide to the best of my ability, is Hippocratic in nature: first, do no harm. I use a long lens and if I choose to move in closer to an animal, I do so gradually, allowing that animal to become accustomed to my presence.
This juvenile heron was experimenting with objects he’d found at Lake Merritt, where the herons are quite acclimated to human contact — perhaps too much so. He was oblivious to my presence as I snapped this shot of him deciding what to do with the leaf.
Yes, I sometimes miss a great shot. Yes, it takes longer, but my ultimate aim is to be in the midst of these creatures I find so spectacular. The reward is sometimes a subtle invitation into their world.
I was photographing shorebirds at Crown Beach in Alameda last year. I’d arisen at dawn to get the best light — and to have a couple of hours before work. My initial shots were far away, less than stellar in terms of being able to fill the frame.
But as I waited it out, as my presence became less threatening, and as I and my monopod became fixtures in their world — at one point, a flock of mixed birds, mostly Black-bellied Plovers, gathered around me. They were used to the sound of my shutter, to my human form on the beach. And as I snapped some photographs, they fell into slumber, my little coterie of shorebirds snuggling for warmth after a morning of foraging.
These are the captures I strive for. These are the reasons I’m out there at the crack of dawn with unwashed hair and lukewarm coffee. That’s when I really feel the connection between my lens and the life force in front of the lens. And, again, I always hope to first do no harm, and second, to present my earth companions in a way that exemplifies who they are and why we need so desperately to protect them while we’re here.
Well said Ingrid.
For those interested in another organization dedicated to ethical behavior and nature photography, I recommend the North American Nature Photography Association of which I am a member. Here is a copy of their ethical field practices.
PRINCIPLES OF ETHICAL FIELD PRACTICES
NANPA believes that following these practices promotes the well being of the location, subject
and photographer. Every place, plant, and animal, whether above or below water, is unique,
and cumulative impacts occur over time. Therefore, one must always exercise good individual
judgment. It is NANPA’s belief that these principles will encourage all who participate in the
enjoyment of nature to do so in a way that best promotes good stewardship of the resource.
ENVIRONMENTAL: KNOWLEDGE OF SUBJECT AND PLACE
Learn patterns of animal behavior
So as not to interfere with animal life cycles.
Do not distress wildlife or their habitat.
Respect the routine needs of animals.
Use appropriate lenses to photograph wild animals.
If an animal shows stress, move back and use a longer lens.
Acquaint yourself with the fragility of the ecosystem.
Stay on trails that are intended to lessen impact.
SOCIAL: KNOWLEDGE OF RULES AND LAWS
When appropriate, inform managers or other authorities of your presence and purpose.
Help minimize cumulative impacts and maintain safety.
Learn the rules and laws of the location.
If minimum distances exist for approaching wildlife, follow them.
In the absence of management authority, use good judgment.
Treat the wildlife, plants and places as if you were their guest.
Prepare yourself and your equipment for unexpected events.
Avoid exposing yourself and others to preventable mishaps.
INDIVIDUAL: EXPERTISE AND RESPONSIBILITIES
Treat others courteously.
Ask before joining others already shooting in an area.
Tactfully inform others if you observe them in engaging in inappropriate or harmful behavior.
Many people unknowingly endanger themselves and animals.
Report inappropriate behavior to proper authorities.
Don’t argue with those who don’t care; report them.
Be a good role model, both as a photographer and a citizen.
Educate others by your actions; enhance their understanding.
And of course right after I posted, I found your link to the very same ethics guidlines.
Glenn, I’m grateful for your comment and accompanying guidelines. In fact, your note inspired me to make the photography-ethics link more clear in my post.
[For anyone who hasn’t seen Glenn’s work, his photography website showcases a catalog of spectacular images of Bay Area raptors and birds. I mentioned Glenn’s photos when I wrote about the peregrines last year, but was remiss in linking out to his site in this particular post.]
Glenn, your photography — documenting the triumphs and travails of our local, nesting peregrines — is unrivaled and much admired at my end. It’s through your lens that the lives of these treasured birds come alive in our hearts. Thank you.
[…] the falcons and on photographer’s ethics when dealing with nature subjects and discovered she is following the same NANPA guidelines that I try to follow as well. She kindly responded with a request to interview me and came up with five very interesting […]
I just came across this post and I just wanted to say thank you for your post and thoughts! I agree whole-heartedly on what you write. I am witnessing far too many paparazzi-like wildlife photographers trying to get the close up shot with no regard for the stress it can caused on the animal.
What do you classify this under?
Trish, I’m so sorry for the delayed reply to your comment. Been in the midst of a chaotic, temporary relocation to the Northwest. Thanks very much for stopping by and having a say about this. I absolutely love and admire your photographs. You’ve inspired me on many occasions. I suppose what we’re all seeing is a natural consequence of digital affordability and access. But that doesn’t excuse it by any stretch, or give the type of license we’ve witnessed. Beyond the wildlife photogs, I’ve also seen people chasing baby animals around with cell phone cameras and the like. I intervene when I can, nicely, hoping they’ll understand. I’ve also been physically assaulted for interfering and am very glad a tripod doubles as a weapon. 😉
These are good tips to follow. I’m sure your consideration is appreciated. Thank you for your post, and God Bless you. 🙂
This sure has enlightened me more about this specific aspect. Thank you!
Read my blog 5 Best Photography Locations in Madagascar Hope this will help.